[2021] 3 SLR 571

Year2021

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 cases
  • Sulzer Pumps Spain, SA v Hyflux Membrane Manufacturing (S) Pte Ltd and another
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 17 June 2020
    ...fides, but this is meant to cover the various formulations of unconscionability. Guidance can also be drawn from CEX v CEY and another [2020] SGHC 100, which has helpfully undertaken a survey of the cases where a bond has been restrained on grounds of unconscionability, and found that uncon......
  • Damai City Sdn Bhd v McC Overseas (M) Sdn Bhd& Other Appeals
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2022
  • Beow Hock Engineering Pte Ltd v Goh Eng Huat and another
    • Singapore
    • District Court (Singapore)
    • 17 February 2023
    ...the court), I find myself in broad agreement with the submissions of counsel for the claimant on the authority of the High Court decision in CEX v CEY and another [2021] 3 SLR 571 (“CEX”) that the call is rooted in illegality and therefore unconscionable. Under the LOA, the value of the wor......
  • First Construction & Engineering Pte Ltd v Yim Hon Yuen
    • Singapore
    • District Court (Singapore)
    • 23 June 2021
    ...the burden of proving a strong prima facie case of unconscionability. The framework to be applied was outlined in CEX v CEY and another [2021] 3 SLR 571. In the plaintiff’s written submissions, it was relying on both grounds of fraud and unconscionability in its application to restrain the ......
2 books & journal articles
  • Banking Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2020, December 2020
    • 1 December 2020
    ...Pte Ltd [2020] 2 SLR 955 at [22]. 84 Samsung C&T Corp v Soon Li Heng Civil Engineering Pte Ltd [2020] 2 SLR 955 at [58]. 85 CEX v CEY [2021] 3 SLR 571. 86 Cap 29, 1999 Rev Ed. 87 CEX v CEY [2021] 3 SLR 571 at [11]. 88 CEX v CEY [2021] 3 SLR 571 at [20]. 89 CEX v CEY [2021] 3 SLR 571 at [11]......
  • Building and Construction Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2020, December 2020
    • 1 December 2020
    ...OGSP Engineering Pte Ltd [2020] SGHC 165 at [120]. 29 Comfort Management Pte Ltd v OGSP Engineering Pte Ltd [2020] SGHC 165 at [126]. 30 [2021] 3 SLR 571. 31 CEX v CEY [2021] 3 SLR 571 at [10]; JBE Properties Pte Ltd v Gammon Pte Ltd [2011] 2 SLR 47 at [11]. 32 CEX v CEY [2021] 3 SLR 571 at......