[2015] 5 SLR 153

Year2015

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
26 cases
  • UHB v UHA
    • Singapore
    • Family Court (Singapore)
    • 18 November 2019
    ...minimise acrimony and discontent between the parties. The effect of such orders is that parties would bear their own costs: see JBB v JBA [2015] SGHCF 6 (at [24]-[26]). In the present case, SUM 2859 was filed before the 26 Apr and 16 Aug 2017 orders were varied by the 28 Aug 2019 orders. As......
  • VWM v VWN
    • Singapore
    • Family Court (Singapore)
    • 15 October 2021
    ...successful vis-à-vis her original prayers. On that footing, and relying on the observations made by Ong J and Choo J in JBB v JVA [2015] 5 SLR 153 (at [32]) and BMG v BMH [2014] 112 (at [10]) respectively, the defendant was of the view that there be no orders as to costs so as not to increa......
  • UQZ v URA
    • Singapore
    • Family Court (Singapore)
    • 8 January 2019
    ...ought to be struck out. At this juncture, I should make a brief mention of the decision of the High Court (Family Division) in JBB v JBA [2015] SGHCF 6 where Debbie Ong JC (as she then was) made the following observations (at [18]): The “no-fault” divorce regime recognises that the breakdow......
  • VJL v VGM
    • Singapore
    • Family Court (Singapore)
    • 19 June 2020
    ...and discovery was undertaken in the proceedings. The award of costs lies in the discretion of the court. It was also stated in JBB v. JBA [2015] SGHCF 6 that the court is free to depart from the guiding principle that costs follow the event (such event being the grant of the interim judgmen......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Family Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2015, December 2015
    • 1 December 2015
    ...the jurisdiction of the Singapore courts. Entitlement to costs in divorce proceedings, ancillary hearings, and appeals 16.65 In JBB v JBA[2015] 5 SLR 153, the wife had commenced proceedings on the basis that the parties had lived apart for a continuous period of at least four years immediat......