[2015] 4 SLR 1064
| Year | 2015 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
Re Gearing, Matthew Peter QC
...some notable and particular expertise relevant to the issues at hand: see Re Beloff at [57]. As I had observed in Re Rogers, Heather QC [2015] 4 SLR 1064 (“Re Rogers”) at [17] and [21], it is not sufficient for the applicant to have general expertise pertaining to the particular issues that......
-
Re Wordsworth, Samuel Sherratt QC
...QC [2013] 4 SLR 921 (“Re Lord Goldsmith”), Re Beloff, Re Fordham, Michael QC [2015] 1 SLR 272 (“Re Fordham”) and Re Rogers, Heather QC [2015] 4 SLR 1064 (“Re Rogers”). These applications were disallowed because the “special reason” requirement for the ring-fenced areas of legal practice und......
-
Re Landau, Toby Thomas QC
...court can say with the benefit of clear legal authority that they will not arise on the facts of the case (see Re Rogers, Heather QC [2015] 4 SLR 1064 (“Re Rogers”) at [54]). Having identified the factual and legal issues that will arise, the court should give some thought as to how they ar......
-
Re Harish Salve
...possess special qualifications or experience relevant to the specific issues which arise in the case at hand (Re Rogers, Heather QC [2015] 4 SLR 1064 (“Re Rogers”) at [17]). As I clarified in Re Fordham, Michael QC [2015] 1 SLR 272 (“Re Fordham”) at [50], the focus here is on the relevance ......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Legal Profession
...spotlight with the Court of Appeal weighing in on the matter in two decisions. Admission Ad hoc admission 21.4 In Re Rogers, Heather QC[2015] 4 SLR 1064 (‘Re Rogers’), the applicant was a Queen's Counsel who sought ad hoc admission to practise as an advocate and solicitor of the Supreme Cou......
