[2013] 1 SLR 125
| Year | 2013 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
58 cases
- Uda Land Sdn Bhd v Puncak Sepakat Sdn Bhd
-
TMM Division Maritima SA de CV v Pacific Richfield Marine Pte Ltd
...Ltd v Citylink Telecommunications Ltd [2007] EWHC 1749 (TCC) (refd) LWInfrastructure Pte Ltd v Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd [2013] 1 SLR 125 (folld) Pacific Recreation Pte Ltd v SYTechnology Inc [2008] 2 SLR (R) 491; [2008] 2 SLR 491 (refd) Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360 (refd)......
- Far East Holdings Bhd and Another v Majlis Ugama Islam dan Adat Resam Melayu Pahang (and 2 Other Appeals)
-
Auf v Aug and Other Matters
...Seng v Outram Realty Pte Ltd [1991] 1 SLR(R) 885; [1991] SLR 818 (refd) L W Infrastructure Pte Ltd v Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd [2013] 1 SLR 125 (folld) Multiplex Constructions (UK) Ltd v Cleveland Bridge UK Ltd [2006] EWHC 1341 (TCC) (refd) Nada Fadil Al-Medenni v Mars UK Ltd [2005] ......
Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
-
Sanctity Of An Arbitration Award: When Does A Breach Of Natural Justice Tip The Balance?
...have made a difference to the arbitrator's reasoning (L W Infrastructure Pte Ltd v Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd and another appeal [2013] 1 SLR 125). Therefore, the crucial matter for the court was whether the material could reasonably have made a difference to the arbitrator, rather th......
-
Important Recent Decision On SOPA: LJH Construction & Engineering Co Pte Ltd v Chan Bee Cheng Gracie [2022] SGHC 230
...to respond ([190] LJH v CBC), and referred to L W Infrastructure Pte Ltd v Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd and another appeal [2013] 1 SLR 125, finding that the adjudicator ought to have contacted the respondent and/or her solicitors to ascertain whether the respondent intended to address ......
-
Do Virtual Hearings Without Parties' Agreement Contravene Due Process? The View From Singapore
...Pte Ltd [2007] 3 SLR 86 ("Soh Beng Tee") at [29]; L W Infrastructure Pte Ltd v Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd and another appeal [2013] 1 SLR 125 ("L W 4 Soh Beng Tee at [42]. 5 Article 18 of the Model Law. 6 Soh Beng Tee at [59]. 7 Anwar Siraj v Ting Kang Chung [2003] 2 SLR 287 at [41]-4......
1 books & journal articles
-
Arbitration
...of the award by which the rights of any party have been prejudiced’. 4.5 In L W Infrastructure Pte Ltd v Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd[2013] 1 SLR 125 (‘L W Infrastructure Pte Ltd’), the plaintiff was the defendant's subcontractor in a building project. The defendant terminated the subco......
