[2012] 4 SLR 36
| Year | 2012 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
17 cases
- Dynacast (Melaka) Sdn Bhd v Vision Cast Sdn Bhd
-
Concept Math Education Centre Pte Ltd v Aw Bixi, Charlotte
...infringement. This can be seen in cases such as PH Hydraulics & Engineering Pte Ltd v Intrepid Offshore Construction Pte Ltd and another [2012] 4 SLR 36 (“PH Hydraulics”) at [95]; Nanofilm Technologies International Pte Ltd v Semivac International Pte Ltd and others [2018] 5 SLR 956 at [206......
-
Leiman, Ricardo and another v Noble Resources Ltd and another
...applied in numerous Singapore cases including PH Hydraulics & Engineering Pte Ltd v Intrepid Offshore Construction Pte Ltd and another [2012] 4 SLR 36 at [55], and Invenpro (M) Sdn Bd v JCS Automation Pte Ltd and another [2014] 2 SLR 1045 (“Invenpro”) at [129]. The three basic elements to b......
-
RB Investments Pte Ltd v Kardachi, Jason Aleksander
...SLR 442 (folld) Mah Kiat Seng v AG [2022] 3 SLR 890 (refd) PH Hydraulics & Engineering Pte Ltd v Intrepid Offshore Constructions Pte Ltd [2012] 4 SLR 36 (folld) Shlosberg v Avonwick Holdings Ltd [2017] 2 WLR 1075 (folld) Vestwin Trading Pte Ltd v Obegi Melissa [2006] SGHC 107 (refd) Wee Shu......
Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
-
REVISITING THE LAW OF CONFIDENCE IN SINGAPORE AND A PROPOSAL FOR A NEW TORT OF MISUSE OF PRIVATE INFORMATION
...v Earnson Management (S) Pte Ltd [2007] 1 SLR(R) 1 at [65]; PH Hydraulics & Engineering Pte Ltd v Intrepid Offshore Construction Pte Ltd [2012] 4 SLR 36 at [55]; Invenpro (M) Sdn Bhd v JCS Automation Pte Ltd [2014] 2 SLR 1045 at [129]; Clearlab SG Pte Ltd v Ting Chong Chai [2015] 1 SLR 163 ......
-
Intellectual property
...consultant, or by the consultant and any other party. 23 16 PH Hydraulics & Engineering Pte Ltd v Intrepid Ofshore Construction Pte Ltd [2012] SGHC 133 at [31], per Tay Yong Kwang J. 17 Meikle v Maufe [1941] 3 All ER 144; Darwin Fibreglass Pty Ltd v Kruhse Enterprises Pty Ltd [1998] NTSC 44......
-
STATUTORY DAMAGES FOR USE OF A “COUNTERFEIT TRADE MARK” AND FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT IN SINGAPORE
...v Cuffz (Singapore) Pte Ltd[2015] SGHCR 15 at [46]. 92Louis Vuitton Malletier v Cuffz (Singapore) Pte Ltd[2015] SGHCR 15 at [47]. 93[2012] 4 SLR 36. 94PH Hydraulics & Engineering Pte Ltd v Intrepid Offshore Construction Pte Ltd[2012] 4 SLR 36 at [86]–[87]. 95 In US legislation, 17 USC § 504......
-
Contract Law
...12.101 A restrictive covenant was, however, upheld in PH Hydraulics & Engineering Pte Ltd v Intrepid Offshore Construction Pte Ltd[2012] 4 SLR 36. Here, the plaintiff was a company that designed and provided electrical installations for the marine industry. The second defendant was a mechan......
Get Started for Free
