[2004] 3 SLR 316

Year2004

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
11 cases
  • ZI Production Sdn v SACC Convec Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2017
  • KLIAA-KLIAC Consortium & 2 Ors v Latipah binti Abu t/a LA Architect
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2020
  • Lacey v Zion and Sea Shells Reefs Ltd
    • Antigua and Barbuda
    • High Court (Antigua)
    • 6 February 2007
    ...the “ Purchase Money Mortgage. See G. Scammell and Nephew. Limited v. H.C. and J.G. Ouston [1941] A.C. 251 and Compaq Computer Asia Pte Ltd. v. Computer Interface (S) Pte Ltd. [2005] 2 L.R.C. 136. 22. The first defendant submits that having regard to Clauses 3 and 9 of the Agreement, the pa......
  • Lai Ling Wan v Commissioner of Stamp Duties
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 5 August 2011
    ...at [17] to [19], [22] and [23]. AG v Cohen [1937] 1 KB 478 (refd) Compaq Computer Asia Pte Ltd v Computer Interface (S) Pte Ltd [2004] 3 SLR (R) 316; [2004] 3 SLR 316 (folld) Comptroller of Income Tax v GE Pacific Pte Ltd [1994] 2 SLR (R) 948; [1994] 2 SLR 690 (folld) Ng Swee Lang v Sassoon......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Contract Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2004, December 2004
    • 1 December 2004
    ...for instance, Chwee Kin Keong v Digilandmall.com Pte Ltd[2005] 1 SLR 502, Compaq Computer Asia Pte Ltd v Computer Interface (S) Pte Ltd[2004] 3 SLR 316, Chia Ee Lin Evelyn v Teh Guek Ngor Engelin[2004] 4 SLR 330 (which has been affirmed on appeal — see Teh Guek Ngor Engelin née Tan v Chia E......
  • RESOLVING AMBIGUITY THROUGH EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2005, December 2005
    • 1 December 2005
    ...2 Lloyd’s Rep 601 at 619, per Lloyd LJ. 11 [2002] 1 All ER (Comm) 737. 12 Supra n 4. 13 [2000] 3 SLR 341. 14 [2003] 3 SLR 362. 15 [2004] 3 SLR 316 (“Compaq Computer”). 16 [2004] SGHC 194. 17 Ibid at [42]. 18 Id at [56]. 19 Thoresen & Co (Bangkok) Ltd v Fathom Marine Company Ltd [2004] 1 Llo......
  • Building and Construction Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2004, December 2004
    • 1 December 2004
    ...the full contract has not been finalised and executed. 5.5 The case of Compaq Computer Asia Pte Ltd v Computer Interface (S) Pte Ltd[2004] 3 SLR 316 offers a useful reminder of how the period after the letter of award and before finalisation of contract terms will be analysed. The main issu......