[2002] 4 SLR 495

Year2002

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 cases
  • Ahmad Kasim bin Adam v Moona Esmail Tamby Merican s/o Mohamed Ganse
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 10 April 2019
    ...Moulmein Development Pte Ltd v Teo Teck Guan [1998] 1 SLR(R) 195; [1998] 1 SLR 931 (folld) Ng Boo Tan v Collector of Land Revenue [2002] 2 SLR(R) 633; [2002] 4 SLR 495 (refd) Ng Chee Keong v Lembaga Letrik Negara [1991] 1 CLJ 567 (refd) Ng Kim Moi (P) v Pentadbir Tanah Daerah, Seremban, Neg......
  • Goldring Timothy Nicholas v PP
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 25 April 2013
    ...v PP [2011] 3 SLR 1205 (folld) National Assistance Board v Wilkinson [1952] 2 QB 648 (refd) Ng Boo Tan v Collector of Land Revenue [2002] 2 SLR (R) 633; [2002] 4 SLR 495 (refd) Peter Settelen v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2004] EWHC 2171 (Ch) (refd) PP v Lo Ah Eng [1965] 1......
  • Wan Lai Cheng v Quek Seow Kee
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 31 July 2012
    ...4 SLR 605 (refd) Lee Puey Hwa v Tay Cheow Seng [1991] 2 SLR (R) 196; [1991] SLR 198 (folld) Ng Boo Tan v Collector of Land Revenue [2002] 2 SLR (R) 633; [2002] 4 SLR 495 (refd) Ong Chen Leng v Tan Sau Poo [1993] 2 SLR (R) 545; [1993] 3 SLR 137 (folld) Sigrid Else Roger Marthe Wauters v Liev......
  • Reed, Michael v Bellingham, Alex (Attorney-General, intervener)
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 9 September 2022
    ...principle or right unless Parliament has by express words, or necessary implications, done so”: Ng Boo Tan v Collector of Land Revenue [2002] 2 SLR(R) 633 (“Ng Boo Tan”) at [76]. The AG argues that there is nothing in the text of s 32 or the wider statutory context to show clearly that Parl......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Land Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2002, December 2002
    • 1 December 2002
    ...value caused by process of acquisition to be taken into account in awarding compensation 17.41 In Ng Boo Tan v Collector of Land Revenue[2002] 4 SLR 495, the appellant appealed against an award of compensation made by the Collector of Land Revenue who took into account the depreciation in m......