[1997] 3 SLR 1018
| Year | 1997 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
- Westford Ltd v Archipelago Insurance Ltd
-
Sin Yuan Hong LP Gas Pte Ltd v NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Ltd
...Parties) [1933] 2 KB 597 at 611 Chitty on Contracts at [31-061] and [34-047]. In Lim Kitt Ping Lynette v People’s Insurance Co Ltd [1997] 1 SLR(R) 914 (“Lim Kitt Ping”), the High Court had the occasion to consider a clause similar to Condition 11. The High Court accepted that the defendant ......
-
[2008] 4 SLR 95
...and Essex and Suffolk Accident Indemnity Society, In re [1912] 1 KB 415 (folld) Lim Kitt Ping Lynnette v People's Insurance Co Ltd [1997] 1 SLR (R) 914; [1997] 3 SLR 1018 (refd) NTUC Co-operative Insurance Commonwealth Enterprise Ltd v Chiang Soong Chee [2008] 2 SLR (R) 373; [2008] 2 SLR 37......
-
Tay Eng Chuan v Ace Insurance Ltd
...context, an example of a Scott v Avery clause can be found in the High Court case of Lim Kitt Ping Lynnette v People’s Insurance Co Ltd [1997] 3 SLR 1018 (“People’s Insurance Co Ltd”). The material clause in that case (“condition 8”) read as follows (id at All differences arising out of thi......
1 books & journal articles
-
Arbitration
...to a suit by the insured who had failed to comply with the condition precedent: see Lim Kitt Ping Lynnette v People”s Insurance Co Ltd[1997] 3 SLR 1018. Much, however, depends on the specificity of the covenant which the parties had entered into. 3.2 The plaintiff in Tay Eng Chuan v Ace Ins......
