[1997] 2 SLR 233
| Year | 1997 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
10 cases
-
Lee Kuan Yew v Tang Liang Hong and Another
... ... - ... Lee filed an affidavit in support of his application to ... strike out the defence of Tang and other ancillary ... orders for his failure to comply with certain orders of ... the court ... 11 March 1997 ... - ... It seemed to us that Tang`s act of disclosure was wholly extraneous to the process of the court or the use of its machinery. His actions had nothing to do with court proceedings. The only tenuous connection was that an affidavit, a court document, was involved. With respect, we did not ... ...
-
Lee Hsien Loong v Singapore Democratic Party
... ... Two separate defamation actions were commenced on 26 April 2006 in respect of ... The plaintiff in Suit 262 is Mr Lee Kuan Yew (“LKY”), the Minister Mentor of ... on the morning of 12 May 2008 were two other applications, one for each of the Present ... the [P]laintiffs have been dishonest in another respect – namely, in suing their critics for ... among others, Mr J. B. Jeyaretnam, Mr Tang Liang Hong and CSJ were true and those actions ... ...
-
Lee Kuan Yew v Tang Liang Hong and Another
...judge dismissed the application and delivered his grounds of judgment on 21 March 1997, reported in Lee Kuan Yew v Tang Liang Hong [1997] 1 SLR (R) 538. This appeal is against that decision. 44 In so far as the first prayer of the summons is concerned, ie that the learned judge be disqualif......
-
Chee Siok Chin and Another v Attorney General
...(UK) Ltd v Bayfield Properties Ltd [2000] QB 451 at [3]). In one local case, actual bias was alleged (see Lee Kuan Yew v Tang Liang Hong [1997] 2 SLR 233). In that case, what was alleged against the judge was that he had a pecuniary interest in the outcome of the matter such as to disqualif......
Get Started for Free
