[1994] 1 SLR 634

Year1994

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
56 cases
  • Teo Ai Ling v Koh Chai Kwang
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 12 February 2010
    ...at times used interchangeably: see Teo Seng Kiat v Goh Hwa Teck [2003] 1 SLR(R) 333 (“Teo Seng Kiat”), Teo Sing Keng v Sim Bian Kiat [1994] 1 SLR(R) 340. It is, however, important to recognise that there is a fundamental difference between the two when computing damages. Compensation for lo......
  • Muhammad Adam bin Muhammad Lee v Tay Jia Rong Sean
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 23 December 2021
    ...SLR 389 (refd) Tan Woo Thian v PricewaterhouseCoopers Advisory Services Pte Ltd [2021] 1 SLR 1166 (folld) Teo Sing Keng v Sim Ban Kiat [1994] 1 SLR(R) 340; [1994] 1 SLR 634 (refd) Thomson Plaza (Pte) Ltd v Liquidators of Yaohan Department Store Singapore Pte Ltd [2001] 2 SLR(R) 246; [2001] ......
  • Poh Huat Heng Corporation Pte Ltd v Hafizul Islam Kofil Uddin
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 25 June 2012
    ...of 18 years was applied in respect of the plaintiff, who was injured at the age of 28. In Teo Sing Keng and another v Sim Ban Kiat [1994] 1 SLR(R) 340 (cited in Practitioners’ Library at p 651), a multiplier of 15 years was applied in respect of the plaintiff, who was injured at the age of ......
  • Koh Chai Kwang v Teo Ai Ling
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 20 May 2011
    ...a student who has yet to enter the employment market, the situation poses a special challenge. In Teo Sing Keng & Anor v Sim Ban Kiat [1994] 1 SLR(R) 340, this court stated at [40] that an award for LEC is generally made “where there is no available evidence of the plaintiff’s earnings to e......
  • Get Started for Free